Goldman Sachs suggests Comrade Kamala is beneficial for the economy. She’s not even doing communism correctly!
To be frank, I’m not entirely clear on what ‘communism’ and ‘socialism’ really mean, since understanding that would require some reading, and I regard knowledge as a means of liberal brainwashing.
Good news, fellow patriots. I’ve discovered yet another area where Democratic presidential candidate “Comrade Kamala Harris” falls short: Communism.
As you’ve likely heard from GOP presidential contender Donald Trump and other insightful leaders on the right, Harris is branded a communist, a socialist, a Marxist, and probably several other -ists designed to instill fear.
On Wednesday, Trump shared a video on his social media where he stated: “Comrade Kamala Harris is disastrous for our nation, truly disastrous. She is a communist, has always been a communist, and will always remain a communist.”
Trump and his allies affirm Kamala Harris is a communist, right?
During a recent reelection campaign event, Trump remarked about Harris: “Our strategy is simple: label our opponent as a communist or socialist or someone who will ruin our country.”
Trump supporter Elon Musk recently shared an AI-generated image depicting Harris in a red communist uniform and commented: “Kamala promises to act as a communist dictator on her first day. Can you believe she wears that outfit!?”
At last week’s annual Moms for Liberty conference in Washington, D.C., The Associated Press noted a painting near the security check that depicted Vice President Kamala Harris kneeling over a dead bald eagle, sporting a communist emblem on her jacket, with her mouth dripping blood.
Why do economists believe Comrade Kamala’s economic plans are favorable?
If Trump, Musk, and Moms for Liberty are signaling to me that the current vice president of the United States is a communist, I’ll take their word for it since I’ve never caught these people in lies or hypocrisy.
And I am shocked ‒ SHOCKED, I say ‒ that an actual, hardened communist is competing for the presidency.
However, what’s even more shocking is the recent insights from economists at the investment firm Goldman Sachs, indicating that a Harris win in November could positively influence the U.S. economy, while a Trump victory could mean a “blow to growth.”
The economists stated: “Should Democrats gain full control, new spending and increased tax credits for middle-income earners would more than balance out the lower investments expected from higher corporate tax rates, leading to a slight boost in GDP growth on average over 2025-2026.”
Goldman Sachs claims Harris’ economic strategy promotes growth, while Trump’s does not
And in the event Trump defeats Comrade Kamala the communist? The Goldman Sachs report noted: “We predict that if Trump wins—either through a sweep or with a split government—the negative impact on growth from tariffs and stricter immigration policies would overshadow the positive financial stimulus from maintaining most corporate tax cuts.”
WHAT IN THE NAME OF VLADIMIR LENIN IS HAPPENING HERE?!?
Why are some of the world’s leading capitalists at Goldman Sachs suggesting that a potential communist dictator would benefit our economy?
This news follows a nonpartisan report from the Penn Wharton Budget Model indicating that the economic strategy of Capitalist King Trump would inflate the deficit nearly five times more than that of Communist Comrade Kamala.
Kamala Harris might be the most ineffective communist in history
Honestly, I don’t fully grasp what “communism” and “socialism” entail because understanding those concepts would require reading, which I believe is a vehicle for liberal brainwashing.
Nevertheless, I am completely confident that Trump, Musk, and other Republicans and sensible right-wingers who advocate for banning books understand the true implications of such terms.
Clear descriptions of the terms being assigned to Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
If it’s true that Harris and Walz are indeed the communists everyone fears, then the most rational deduction from the Goldman Sachs headlines would be this: They are shockingly poor at effectively executing communist principles.
This is quite unfortunate. I doubt America should elect leaders who define communism yet fail terribly at fulfilling basic responsibilities as communists.
Why is a so-called communist like Harris advocating for small businesses?
Just take a listen to Comrade Kamala during her recent campaign speeches, where she promoted her communist economic ideas designed to assist small businesses: “We will increase the tax deduction for new businesses to $50,000. It’s pretty much a tax break for launching a small business.
“Furthermore, my strategy will aid current small businesses in their growth. We plan to offer low and no-interest loans to small businesses looking to expand. Also — and this is crucial — we will eliminate the bureaucratic hurdles that complicate the process of starting and growing a small business.”
What kind of communist talks like that? Harris should see the small business community as a group destined for failure in a capitalist environment, destined to be either overwhelmed by the capitalist class owning the production means or the working class laboring for them. It’s all about “Workers of the world, unite!” not “Small business owners of the world, thrive with subsidized loans!”
Clearly, Comrade Kamala is not just an unsuccessful vice president, as Trump has pointed out. She also seems to be a failed communist, attempting to stimulate America’s economy through sensible capitalist policies aimed at benefiting workers.
No chance I’m supporting that level of ineptitude.
Keep up with YSL News columnist Rex Huppke on X, formerly known as Twitter, @RexHuppke and follow him on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk