Donald Trump’s initial cabinet nominations during his first presidency weren’t the best, but his current choices are exceptionally concerning.

This time, Trump has put forward Florida Representative Matt Gaetz for attorney general; Tulsi Gabbard, a former congresswoman from Hawaii, for director of national intelligence; and South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem for secretary of Homeland Security.

It’s hard to imagine a worse candidate for attorney general than Gaetz. He lacks the qualifications needed for the role, and many of Trump’s other nominees seem to follow suit. It appears that their primary qualification is their unwavering loyalty to Trump, which leaves it to other Republicans to step up and champion better choices.

Concerns about Trump’s cabinet nominations loom large

While it may seem overly cautious, I seriously doubt Trump can secure the approval of 50 Senate Republicans for some of his most controversial nominees, especially Gaetz and Gabbard.

Notably, Senators Susan Collins from Maine and Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, both known for their moderate views, have openly criticized Gaetz’s nomination.

“This nomination for attorney general is not serious,” Murkowski commented regarding Gaetz’s selection. “We need someone credible in that role.”

Collins expressed her surprise at Gaetz’s nomination, stating it highlights why the advice-and-consent process is crucial. “I’m sure many questions will be raised during his confirmation hearing,” she noted.

With the GOP holding a 53-47 majority in the Senate, they can only afford four defections. Considering Collins and Murkowski are already voicing dissent against some selections, Trump’s options are becoming overly restricted.

Possible red flags about Trump and the new administration?

Ultimately, Trump’s inclination to push through candidates who may lack qualifications, but exhibit unyielding loyalty to him, aligns with the very concerns raised about a potential second Trump presidency.

Trump is following a path that his critics warned about prior to his first election, which raises serious alarms for the future of America.

Additionally, Trump has proposed using recess appointments—traditionally used to fill vacancies when the Senate isn’t session—to circumvent the conventional confirmation process. This tactic would allow appointees to remain in place until the congressional session ends in two years.

Even constitutional scholars on the conservative side have raised doubts about the viability of this plan, which would require Senate Republicans to remain passive for it to succeed.

Senate Republicans are now faced with the important task of safeguarding the checks and balances that our system relies on, especially as Trump seems inclined to undermine them. I urge them to remain resolute, particularly the four necessary to block these unwarranted nominees.