Tragic Turn of Events: Utah Family Found in Devastating Circumstances

'A heavy heart': Police believe Utah father shot himself, wife and couple's 4 children This story contains mention of suicide. If you are at risk of suicide, please stop here and contact 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline for support. Police in Utah believe a father killed his wife and three children and critically injured their 17-year-old son at
HomeHealthBreakthrough: Urine Test for Head and Neck Cancer Detection

Breakthrough: Urine Test for Head and Neck Cancer Detection

Scientists‌ at the University of Michigan Health Rogel Cancer⁣ Center have developed ⁣a‍ urine-based test ​that‍ can identify DNA fragments from head ‌and neck tumors. This test has the potential to make early detection of this ⁤type ⁢of cancer ‌easier, as there is currently‌ no ⁢reliable screening method available. The researchers created a test that can detect pieces of DNA fragments released by⁢ head and neck tumors. This urine-based test could potentially allow for the early‌ detection⁣ of this type of cancer, ​which currently lacks a reliable‍ screening⁣ method.is well known for its association with cervical cancer, but it is now being linked to cancers in ‌the oral cavity, throat, and ‌other areas of ‌the head and neck.

Early detection is crucial because ⁣finding cancer at an ⁣early ⁣stage ⁣can result ⁢in better outcomes for patients.

Using whole genome sequencing, the Rogel group demonstrated that cell-free DNA fragments released by tumor‍ cells, which travel from the​ bloodstream to the urine through the ⁢kidneys,‌ are primarily​ ultra-short, containing fewer ⁢than 50 base pairs. Due to their small size, ‍these fragments are likely to go ‌undetected by traditional urine or blood-based ⁣liquid biopsy tests.The research, led‌ by Muneesh Tewari, M.D., Ph.D., J. Chad Brenner, Ph.D., and Paul L. Swiecicki, M.D., aimed to detect ⁢circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Initial findings were​ published in JCI Insight. The team found that conventional‍ assays ​are not‌ able to detect​ ultrashort DNA fragments in urine, as they are designed to target longer DNA fragments.‍ Therefore, they took an ⁤unconventional approach to developing a ​urine test.The study co-first author and research specialist, Chandan Bhambhani,‍ Ph.D., described the test for ⁤detecting HPV-positive head ⁢and neck cancer ⁣ctDNA as ‌still in ⁣the​ discovery phase but already ⁣being⁤ used for research. The mail-in test has been given to patients ‌within a hundred-plus ‌miles​ of‌ Ann Arbor⁤ to collect data‍ on ⁢the effectiveness of the at-home kit.⁢ Participants provide​ a urine sample and send it back to the U-M laboratory for‍ testing to ⁤determine the presence or absence of head ‌and neck ​cancer. One of the study’s most notable outcomes is the⁢ distribution of ‌the ⁢test for⁤ research ⁤purposes.”The ‌developed⁢ test has been‌ able to identify cancer recurrences much earlier than would typically​ be⁢ possible through ‌clinical ‌imaging. These promising results have given us the confidence to expand the scope of the study and distribute the test ‍even further,” said Brenner, co-senior ‍author of the study.

While the ⁢initial focus was on head and⁤ neck cancer, the‌ study also⁤ outlines⁤ a new method that ‌could be used to broaden the test to detect other types of cancer. For instance,⁤ the test has shown⁣ the ability to⁢ detect ctDNA in the urine of patients with‍ breast cancer ​and acute myeloid leukemia. This indicates that the test could⁣ be applicable to a wider range of cancers.The study has revealed new possibilities for investigating⁢ the use of urine-based testing for various‍ cancers. According to Bhambhani, urine contains‍ information about different types of cancer, despite being produced⁤ in the kidneys. The differences ⁣in ctDNA⁤ fragment sizes and the test developed for detecting⁤ HPV-positive⁣ head‌ and neck cancer provide essential insights into the development of⁢ urine-based diagnostic assays ⁢for different cancers. ⁤Bhambhani also believes that these tests are likely to‌ be more widely‍ accepted by patients​ needing follow-up testing after treatment, due to the convenience of urine-based testing.The ⁢study found that self-collection​ of samples is more effective than blood-based assays. The research ⁢was funded⁤ by several ​organizations including NIH grants, National Cancer Institute grants, American Cancer‌ Society grants, and the A. Alfred Taubman Medical Research Institute.